Transformational Generative Grammar — Theoretical Grammar | iFREEstore

Transformational Generative Grammar

What is generative-transformational grammar?

Introduced in 1957 by Noam Chomsky, his idea of generative-transformational grammar revolutionized the field. Although his current linguistic theories are quite different, we can't talk about linguistics today without looking at Chomsky's generative-transformational grammar. Chomsky's theory offers math-based rules that we can use to visually illustrate how speakers of English -- and all languages -- put sentences together.

Beginning in 1957, Chomsky introduced two central ideas relevant to grammatical theories. The first was the distinction between competence and performance, which we've already looked at in module 1. Central to his theory was explanation of knowledge that underlies the human ability to speak and understand. One of the most important of his ideas is that most of this knowledge is innate, with the result that a baby is born wired to acquire language and needs only actually learn the idiosyncratic features of the language's he or she is exposed to. Perhaps more significantly, he made concrete and technically sophisticated proposals about the structure of language.

The second idea related directly to the evaluation of theories of grammar. Generative transformational grammartries to explain language creativity: how we are able to utter and interpret sentences we have not heard before. Creativity is made possible by the generative nature of transformational grammar. In order to create and understand newly generated sentences, we must depend on our language competence. Our competence derives from our knowledge of grammar: grammar shapes each of our utterances, setting the boundaries for what is acceptable and ensuring that we will be understood. We compose and structure each of our utterances based on our knowledge of what is acceptable according to the grammatical systems. 

What are phrase structure rules?

In generative-transformational grammar theory, phrase structure rules illustrate mathematically our knowledge of how the basic units of a sentence are assembled. 

The theory of phrase structure rules states that there is a limited number of rules that are carefully ordered:

  1.  there is a limited number of rules which serve to reflect the linguistic competence and knowledge of a native speaker
  2.  these rules are arranged in an order: rule 1 must preceded rule 2, which must precede rule 3, etc.
  3.  the rules can be illustrated in phrase structure trees
  4.  these rules can be equated mathematically in phrase structure rules.

According to this theory, you can take a sentence and mathematically divide it into parts.

Chomsky explains that phrase structure rules are are basically "rewriting" rules. For instance, a sentence can be rewritten as a noun phrase plus a verb phrase. In the notation of transformational grammar, this rule is written as: 

S --> NP + VP  "a sentence consists of a noun phrase followed by a verb phrase"

Starting with this base, we can begin to build rules which will allow us to generate an infinite number of sentences.

Building a grammar

Our Goal: to build a grammar that generates all of the possible sentences of (English, German, Swahili) and none of the impossible sentences.

Before we begin, we need to recognize that the individual words in a sentence are organized into naturally coherent groups call constituents.

We've already looked at constituents in our activity on identifying subjects and predicates. In these sentences, the subject and predicate are marked:

John snores.Everyone likes the show.A book lay on the table.The dogs chased after the children.

Seen another way, the constituents in these sentences consist of a noun phrase (NP) and  a verb phrase (VP):

NPVPJohn   snoresEveryonelikes the showA booklay on the tableThe dogschased after the children

The first rule we created above is S --> NP + VP "a sentence consists of a noun phrase + a verb phrase". This rule can be illustrated in this chart:

 S NP VPJohn snoresEveryone likes the show.A book lay on the table.The dogs chased after the children.

In the system of rules, S stands for Sentence, NP for Noun Phrase, VP for Verb Phrase, Det for Determiner, Aux for Auxiliary (verb), N for Noun, and V for Verb stem.

Look at the noun phrases in the examples. Some consist of a single noun (John, everyone):

NP --> N "a noun phrase consists of a noun" 

 Others consist of an article (a, an) or a determiner (the) plus a noun:

NP --> Det + N "a noun phrase consists of a determiner plus a noun"  

We're beginning to account for creativity and grammaticality judgments.

Let's look at verb phrases in the examples (pasted here again for your convenience):

 S NP VPJohn snoresEveryone likes the show.A book lay on the table.The dogs chased after the children.

VP --> V "a verb phrase consists of a verb"   

VP --> V + NP "a verb phrase consists of a verb and a noun phrase"NP --> Det + N ("the snow"), a rule we already created above

But the VP rule doesn't explain lay on the table or chased after the children. We need a new VP rule to explain these phrases:

VP --> V + PP "a verb phrase consists of a verb and a prepositional phrase" (lay on the table)

PP--> Prep + NP "a prepositional phrase consists of a preposition and a noun phrase" (on the table)

NP --> Det + N "a noun phrase consists of a determiner and a noun" (the table)

 With the rules we have so far...

S --> NP + VP

NP --> N

NP --> Det + N

VP --> V 

VP --> V + NP

 ... we can generate sentences like...

The dog chased the cat. |      |     |        |    |Det   N      V       Det N

... that are explained by these rules:

S --> NP + VP NP --> Det + NP  NP --> NVP --> V + NP

These phrase structure rules fulfill at least three roles: 

  1.  they show how sentences can be broken down to illustrate their structure
  2.  they show a general manner of creating sentences
  3.  they provide a way for us to compare languages

Thus phrase structure rules were formulated in order to construct unlimited sentences with a small number of rules. 

There is much more to generative-transformational grammar than we've covered in this lesson, including displaying complex sentences and then taking the rules a step further to form another set of rules, called transformational rules, which enable more flexibility and to explain how statements can be transformed into questions or negations. In addition, Noam Chomsky's theories are not without their critics. Still, all linguists owe a debt of thanks to Chomsky for showing us how to illustrate how languages put sentences together.

← Предыдущая
Страница 1
Следующая →



Размер: 314.5 Кб


Пожаловаться на материал

Exam Questions. The Subject of Theoretical Grammar. Syntagmatic relations. Segmental units. History of English Grammars. Parts of speech. The noun as a part of speech.

У нас самая большая информационная база в рунете, поэтому Вы всегда можете найти походите запросы

Искать ещё по теме...

Эта тема принадлежит разделу:

Theoretical Grammar

Exam Questions. The Subject of Theoretical Grammar. Syntagmatic relations. Segmental units. History of English Grammars. Parts of speech. The noun as a part of speech.

Похожие материалы:

Оформление Курсового/Дипломного проекта

Цель выполнения курсового проекта - формирование навыков самостоятельного творческого решения профессиональных задач. Задачи выполнения курсового проекта - систематизация, закрепление, углубление и расширение приобретенных студентом знаний, умений, навыков по определенному комплексу учебных дисциплин.

Стратегія розвитку лісового господарства

Удосконалення ведення лісового господарства. Реформування економічної та фінансової системи ведення лісового господарства. Участь України у міжнародних процесах із збереження та захисту лісів.

Звіт з навчальної практики спеціальності «Управління персоналом і економіка праці»

Основні напрями роботи кафедри управління персоналом та економіки праці. Поняття документообігу підприємства. Складання номенклатури та формування справ. Приймання розгляд та реєстрація документів. Робота з вихідними документами. Організація контролю за виконанням документів.

Роль, значение и оценка эффективности государственного финансового контроля в России, перспективы его развития

Курсовая работа По дисциплине «Финансы, денежное обращение и кредит». Финансовый контроль. Понятие и сущность. Роль и значение. Методы и формы. Оценка эффективности государственного финансового контроля в РФ. Понятие оценки эффективности. Анализ оценки эффективности государственного контроля на основе статистических данных федеральной таможенной службы РФ. Перспективы развития государственного финансового контроля. Организационно-правовые основы финансового контроля

Наркомания среди подростков

Философия и социология. Какое действие на человеческий организм оказывают наркотики? Чем страшна наркомания? Излечима ли наркомания? Как проявляется интоксикация марихуаной? Как изменяют наркотики личность? Наркомания среди молодежи. Социальные факторы наркотизма. Проблема наркомании подростковой среде в России.